Live System Status — 142 Findings Active
capa_record.json — AuditCommand

{

FDA 483 Response Drafted in 11 Days ◈ 94% First-Pass Surveillance Audit Rate ◈ 136 ISO 9001 "Shall" Clauses — We Map Every One ◈ Average NCR Backlog Reduced 78% in 60 Days ◈ IATF 16949 Certification in 12 Months Avg ◈ Zero Repeat Findings — 3-Year Track Record ◈ Process FMEA Facilitation · 5-Why Root Cause · CAPA Closure ◈ FDA 483 Response Drafted in 11 Days ◈ 94% First-Pass Surveillance Audit Rate ◈ 136 ISO 9001 "Shall" Clauses — We Map Every One ◈ Average NCR Backlog Reduced 78% in 60 Days ◈ IATF 16949 Certification in 12 Months Avg ◈ Zero Repeat Findings — 3-Year Track Record ◈ Process FMEA Facilitation · 5-Why Root Cause · CAPA Closure ◈
Service Matrix
v2026.02

Three tiers. Every deliverable named.
Hover any row to see what's missing from your current system.

Deliverable
TIER-01
Compliance Rescue
2–4 weeks
TIER-02
System Optimization
6–10 weeks
TIER-03
Certification Readiness
10–18 weeks
Gap Analysis

ISO 9001:2015 Clause-by-Clause Assessment

All 136 "shall" statements evaluated against current documented information

PARTIAL

IATF 16949 Customer Specific Requirements (CSR) Mapping

OEM CSRs from Ford, GM, Stellantis, BMW mapped to process ownership

FDA 21 CFR Part 820 QSR Compliance Audit

Inspection-readiness assessment against current QSR requirements

Conformance Histogram by Clause

Visual heat map showing compliance percentage per ISO/IATF clause

CAPA & NCR

Open NCR Triage & Prioritization

RPN-ranked backlog cleared using severity × occurrence × detection scoring

5-Why Root Cause Facilitation

Facilitated RCA sessions with production, quality, and engineering teams

CAPA Plan Authoring & Effectiveness Verification

Written corrective actions with measurable effectiveness criteria and re-audit schedule

FDA 483 Observation Response Drafting

Complete written response to each observation within 15-business-day window

Process & Documentation

Process FMEA Facilitation

Cross-functional PFMEA workshops with RPN reduction targets and control plan updates

Documented Information Overhaul

Procedure, work instruction, and form library rebuilt to ISO/IATF clause requirements

Process Map & Turtle Diagram Development

Interaction matrix and turtle diagrams for all quality-critical processes

Internal Audit Program

Internal Audit Program Buildout

Annual audit schedule, audit criteria, checklist library, and auditor competency matrix

Full Internal Audit Cycle Execution

One complete audit cycle covering all clauses — required evidence for Stage 1 IATF audit

Auditor Training & Competency Verification

Internal auditor training to ISO 19011 with documented competency records

Certification Prep

Management Review Deck Preparation

Agenda, input data package, and output action items formatted for registrar review

Stage 1 / Stage 2 Audit Readiness Verification

Pre-audit desk review and mock audit against registrar checklist

Surveillance Audit Preparation (Ongoing)

Annual surveillance readiness review with KPI trend analysis and finding closure

Investment
From $8,400
Map Your Gaps
From $34,000
Map Your Gaps
TIER-01
Compliance Rescue
Active nonconformances. Regulatory pressure. Clock running.
From $8,400
TIER-02
System Optimization
Structured QMS improvement. FMEA. Audit program. Documentation.
From $18,500
TIER-03
Certification Readiness
Full pre-audit preparation. Every clause. Every deliverable.
From $34,000
Performance Data
0 days

FDA 483 Response Time

Average time from observation receipt to complete written response submission

0%

First-Pass Surveillance Rate

Clients who pass IATF 16949 and ISO 9001 surveillance audits without major findings

0

ISO 9001 Clauses Mapped

Every "shall" statement in ISO 9001:2015 assessed against your documented system

0%

NCR Backlog Reduction

Average open nonconformance reduction within 60 days of engagement

BENCHMARK

IATF 16949 certification from program inception to registration averages 12 months. Our Certification Readiness clients complete Stage 2 in 10–14 months with zero major nonconformances at initial certification audit.

Client Outcomes

Real findings. Real closures. Real audits passed.

IATF 16949
We had 89 open NCRs and a IATF surveillance audit in six weeks. AuditCommand triaged every finding, ran 5-Why sessions with our floor teams, and wrote CAPA plans that actually closed. We passed with zero major nonconformances.
89 NCRs closed · Zero majors at surveillance
Randall Okafor, Quality Director at Meridian Stamping — Tier 1 Automotive Supplier

Randall Okafor

Quality Director

Meridian Stamping — Tier 1 Automotive Supplier

FDA 21 CFR Part 820
The FDA issued us a 483 with seven observations. Our team was paralyzed. AuditCommand had a complete written response drafted in nine days — every observation addressed with root cause, CAPA, and effectiveness verification criteria. The agency closed five of seven observations on first review.
7 observations · 5 closed on first FDA review
Dr. Priya Venkataraman, VP of Operations at Celeron Pharma — Contract Drug Manufacturer

Dr. Priya Venkataraman

VP of Operations

Celeron Pharma — Contract Drug Manufacturer

ISO 9001:2015
We'd failed Stage 1 twice. Our documented information was a disaster — procedures referencing clauses that no longer existed, work instructions written in 2009. AuditCommand rebuilt the entire library in eight weeks and we passed Stage 2 on the first attempt.
Stage 2 passed first attempt after two prior failures
Marcus Delacroix, Plant Manager at Lakewood Precision Components

Marcus Delacroix

Plant Manager

Lakewood Precision Components

Scope Request

Every gap has a closure date.
Let's set yours.

The scoping questionnaire takes 4 minutes. We ask your certification standard, current nonconformance volume, and next audit date. You receive a proposed scope-of-work within 48 hours.

01certification_standard:[ ISO 9001 | IATF 16949 | FDA 820 | Other ]
02open_ncr_count:[ integer ]
03next_audit_date:[ YYYY-MM-DD ]
Map Your Gaps

No commitment. Scope-of-work delivered within 48 hours.

142 open findings mapped. Ready to close them?

Map Your Gaps →